CS 143
ASIA PACIFIC
PRODUCING WELL
HORIZONTAL
OFFSHORE PLATFORM
SCREEN

3 days that worked v 2 weeks that didn't

H₂S sour, over 50% CO₂, 107°C, filled with 1.6 g/cc mud. The coiled tubing job failed. We treated it: 900 barrels a day.

H₂S sour, over 50% CO₂, 107°C, filled with 1.6 g/cc mud. The coiled tubing job failed. We treated it: 900 barrels a day.

Challenge

The well of a major operator was unable to produce from the long horizontal sand screen section due to a build-up of mud and barite. An attempt to stimulate production with coiled tubing was not successful and the horizontal section was left idle for over 5 years after it was completed.

  • Depth: 3,600 m MD (11,800 ft)
  • Temperature: 107 °C (225 °F)
  • Sour Conditions (>50% CO2; >10ppm H2S)
  • Mud-filled HZ section (based on PLT)

Solution

Improve connectivity to the reservoir by clearing out blockages using electro-hydraulic stimulation technology.

  • Pre-job PLT was run and confirmed that the long horizontal section was filled with heavy well fluid (potentially drilling mud & barite settling).
  • Stimulation carried out with slim-hole through-tubing BLUESPARK® tool over 3 runs via electric-wireline tractor.
  • Only 10% of the total screen section was treated.
  • Job completed in 3 days (versus up to 2 weeks for coiled tubing).

Outcome

  • BLUESPARK® stimulation was successful in treating the sand screen section, remediating the wellbore damage created during the drilling and completion of the well.
  • BLUESPARK® stimulation was successful in spite of the heavy well fluid (1.6g/cc as measured by pre-job PLT) that was encountered.
  • BLUESPARK® saved operator more than USD 1M versus another coiled tubing stimulation job.
  • Production for the HZ well section went from approx. 300 bopd to 900 bopd (average during 3 weeks of post treatment testing).

Talk to our experts

Let's Go

Discover our tools

Let's Go