Case Studies
The energy industry is becoming more innovative by the day — from how wells are drilled, to how those wells are produced, to how that product is refined and sent to market.
Our BLUESPARK® technology has far-reaching applications throughout the lifecycle of a well across the energy sector, including Hydrocarbon and Geothermal. Learn how Blue Spark Energy and our clients are part of the energy evolution.
Search by Region
Africa | Asia Pacific | Canada East | Canada West | Continental Europe | Middle East | North Sea | USA California | USA Mid-Continent | USA Permian
Search by Application
Chemical Treatment | Injection Well | New Well | Open Hole | Producing Well | Scale Removal | P&A
Search by Well Type
Vertical | Deviated | Horizontal | Offshore Platform | Geothermal
NAM-SC-155 (USA geothermal)
The Town of Lakeview’s geothermal district heating system had decreased 45% in flow rate, resulting in the shutdown of some buildings. The treatment resulted in a 134% increase in rate, allowing all buildings to be operational again.
NSEA-PW-152 (Norweigan North Sea)
The BaSO4 scale was removed from the sand screens by BLUESPARK®, resulting in an increase in oil production of 175%
APAC-PW-143 (Asia Pacific)
BLUESPARK® stimulation to improve connectivity to the reservoir by clearing out blockages resulted in a 3x increase in oil production with the job completed in less than 3 days.
MENA-PW-138 (Middle East)
The aggregate oil production for the first 30-days averaged 324 BOPD, up 970% from the pre-BLUESPARK® aggregate of 30.3 BOPD, including one well (Well #4) that had zero production pre-treatment.
MENA-PW-137 (Middle East)
A 60% aggregate increase in oil production for two wells was completed in less than two days.
NAM-PW-134 (USA California)
All wells saw an immediate increase in oil production. The total oil rate for all 4 wells increased 70% for the first 3 months, while the total water decreased by 25%.
NAM-PW-126 (USA Mid-Continent)
The well saw an immediate increase in gas production, which continually rose over the next 3 months. The average gas production increased from 17 MCF/d to 71 MCF/d in a 3-month comparison, an increase of over 300%.
NAM-PW-116 (USA California)
The wells were immediately put back on production and rates, pressures and fluid levels were monitored. The total production for the 5 wells increased by 65% based on a 3-month comparison, while the water cut decreased by 5%.
NAM-PW-114 (USA California)
Oil production in 3 trial wells was over 4x greater after stimulation (3-month comparison).
NAM-PW-113 (USA Permian)
The December 2013 well showed an average increase of 100% (17 BOPD) in oil production and 127% (19 MCF/d) in gas production over 5 months since treatment.
NAM-PW-112 (USA Permian)
Client data from the BLUESPARK® treated well showed an aggregate production increase of 47% for the 4 wells over a 3 month period (from 76 b/d to 112 b/d).
NAM-PW-110 (USA California)
Perforations were cleared, allowing for increased fluid flow into the wellbore. Public data from the BLUEPSARK® treated well showed an average production increase from 0.8 bbl/day to 7.6 b/d (comparing 3 months pre-stimulation to 3 months post-stimulation), an 850% increase.
NAM-PW-108 (Canada West)
The well immediately produced oil at a higher rate that before being shut-in, but water production was less. The oil production increased from 16.3 bbl/d to 26.9 b/d, comparing 3-month pre- to post-BLUESPARK®.
NAM-PW-103 (Canada West)
Worm-holes were re-initiated allowing oil to flow into the well. Client data from the BLUESPARK® treated well showed an average production increase from 0 bbl/day to 5.9 bbl/day for 90 days post stimulation.
NAM-PW-101 (Canada West)
Client data from the BLUESPARK® treated well showed an average production increase from 9.4 bbl/day to 18.9 bbl/day over a one-month period, based on previous test results, a dramatic 100% increase in just oil production.